Mani Raj Paul - What is Water??
What is Water??
Water is largely discussed from a physical or a normative perspective. From a physical perspective,
discussions are usually limited only to the terrestrial part of the hydraulic cycle, comprised of blue water,green water and gray water1 Much of the discussion focuses on blue water, differentiating between surface water and groundwater These conflicting normative views of water have practical ramifications, as each is associated with a different management approach. Thus, the often acrid arguments between these views are closely intertwined with conflicts over concrete policy measures (Bakker, 2007). A common feature in these normative discussions is their view of water as a unitary substance. That is, participants refer to all the (usually blue) water as ‘water’. Yet, this has not always been the case. The view that water is a single substance, due to its chemical composition, is modern (Linton, 2010). In the past, water was viewed in the plural term, ‘waters’, constituting a variety of wet cool substances such as light water, standing water, clear water etc. (Hamlin, 2000). While the fact that water has a common chemical composition is not contested, it is possible to ask whether all the liquids composed of H2O should indeed be treated equally. If the answer is negative, as I propose here, then it is possible perhaps to resolve some of the differences in normative views of water by suggesting that attitudes towards water need not subscribe to one normative view, as different views may pertain to different waters.The relationship between humanity and natural systems is discussed in the Bible, in the book of. Genesis However, different views are expressed within Genesis (Cohen, 1985). In the first chapter, Manis viewed as supreme, and thereby allowed to subdue the earth, and to dominate the fauna and florafor his benefit (particularly, Genesis 1:28). In the second chapter, a different normative approach
is advanced, whereby Man is a steward of nature, who should take care of it (Genesis 2:15). This second normativeposition is the basis for the evolving ethic whereby humans have a moral obligation to sustain
natural ecosystems and hence to retain water in streams, rivers, aquifers and lakes for this purpose (an obligationrecognized in Chapter 18, Part C of Agenda 21). This ethic may be couched in the language ofstewardship, such as Postel’s (1997) water ethic, or Falkenmark & Folke’s (2010) ecohydrosolidarity;ina bio-centric ethic, whereby humans are only the first among equals (Merchant, 1997; Breckenbridge,2 005); or in a view of sustainability and inter-generational ethics, whereby the environmental rights are partof a human right for a green future (Hiskes, 2009).
is advanced, whereby Man is a steward of nature, who should take care of it (Genesis 2:15). This second normativeposition is the basis for the evolving ethic whereby humans have a moral obligation to sustain
natural ecosystems and hence to retain water in streams, rivers, aquifers and lakes for this purpose (an obligationrecognized in Chapter 18, Part C of Agenda 21). This ethic may be couched in the language ofstewardship, such as Postel’s (1997) water ethic, or Falkenmark & Folke’s (2010) ecohydrosolidarity;ina bio-centric ethic, whereby humans are only the first among equals (Merchant, 1997; Breckenbridge,2 005); or in a view of sustainability and inter-generational ethics, whereby the environmental rights are partof a human right for a green future (Hiskes, 2009).
Comments
Post a Comment